Outfield fly? Infield fly? Fans litter field

by + on October 7, 2012

infield-fly.nbcsports-story-612

* St. Louis Cardinals LF Matt Holliday and SS Pete Kozma didn’t catch a pop up in the winner-take-all, wild-card game and … cue the Budweiser beer bottles toss ….

2012 Canadians in the Minors 
2012 Canadians Drafted
2012 Canadians in College
Letters of Intent

 

By Devon Teeple

According to the Major League Baseball rule book:

“An INFIELD FLY is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, when first and second, or first, second and third bases are occupied, before two are out. The pitcher, catcher and any outfielder who stations himself in the infield on the play shall be considered infielders for the purpose of this rule.”

I’m as disappointed as any Atlanta Braves fan around. How can an infield fly be called when the ball travelled more than 200 feet?

Pete Kozma, the St. Louis Cardinals shortstop who is the bane of my existence right now, was making a play on a routine/extraordinary pop up/fly ball.

And left fielder Matt Holliday was obviously coming in to make one of his routine catches.

Did the expected happen? Not exactly!

Kozma backed off and let the ball land between himself and Holliday. And of course in the heat of the moment passionate fans weren’t thinking with a clear head and made a mockery of the game by littering the field.

Fans are obviously passionate about the game, but that does not give us the right to throw bottles or anything on the field. Regardless of what happened, the sun will rise; we all go to work, and the players move on to the next game.

Replay or additional umpires have been suggested, and that might be the case considering the significant amount of errors that have taken place over the past few years;

* Jim Joyce and Armando Galarraga’s Perfect Game

* Doug Eddings and A.J. Pierzynski’s swinging strike three.

* Tim Tschida and Chuck Knoblauch’s phantom tag.

* Tim Welke and first base call in Colorado

* Too many to call from the 2009 postseason

Is the answer instant replay?

I don’t think so.

Aside form replays on questionable home run calls baseball seems reluctant to join the other major sports in using the tool. Because of human error we remember games that happened years ago. Would they be as memorable if things went according to plan? Would we remember Eric Gregg’s strike zone if it wasn’t so terrible?

Would the Yankees dominance in the late 1990’s have even started if fan Jeffery Maier didn’t interfere with the ball in play?

The call on the field was obviously very controversial and will go down in history as a terrible call but it did not cost the Braves the game, it was the errors that did them in. And so far, baseball has stuck by its guns and have not gone to instant replay.

Maybe it’s for the best. No one is perfect-not the players and not the umpires. You can’t question every ball and strike and if the umpire blows a call so be it; it’s happened before and it will happen again. That’s what separates baseball form the rest and why it’s history can be recalled at any moment.

Devon Teeple
Devon is the founder of The GM's Perspective. Devon is an author for the Business of Sports Network, which includes the Biz of Baseball, the Biz of Football, the Biz of Basketball and the Biz of Hockey. He is also a contributor to the Canadian Baseball Network. Devon is a Demand Media Studios writer, featured writer on Examiner.com, member of the Yarbarker Network, and is an Associate Member of the Professional Writers Association of Canada.

Read full bio

Leave a Reply